VICTORY, VICTORY, VICTORY - WHAT IS WRONG WITH VICTORY ?
Has this nation become so weak minded and the leadership in Washington and those who claim to be our allies so political that the simple yet complete goal of victory is no longer even allowed in the American vocabulary. With all of the advise coming from Democrats, weak kneed Republicans and the completely useless and appeasing Iraq Study Group recommendations, no one has the guts nor the sense enough to realize that without full and complete victory Iraq will crumble and become a state of anarchy and tyranny that would make Saddam Hussein look like Mickey Mouse. Terrorism will reign as the driving force in much of the world with a continual goal of destroying America. Israel will no longer exist as a country, Iran will become the dominant player and in essence the complete ruler of what we now know as the Middle East with full nuclear capability and the ability to dictate policy by use of the nuclear threat with the full and complete support and assistance of an ally called Russia. When James Baker was asked about victory during the revelation of the Iraq Study Groups recommendations his response to using even the WORD victory was a lame attempt to appease the politically correct by stating that they did not want to use political catch phrases like , "victory and cut and run." Victory is not a catch phrase but a legitimate goal and solution to the Middle East problem. We are The United States of America and the ONLY remaining superpower in the world but if one were to judge our status by our actions one would have no alternative but to come to the conclusion that we fear Iran and did not have the capability to win in Iraq because of our weakness. General Douglas MacArthur once stated that in war, "there is no substitute for victory!" In WWII we settled only for total and complete victory and the defeat of the forces that sought world domination then with American compassion and will power rebuilt the nations the we had defeated. But only AFTER their total and complete defeat eliminating any capability to wage war on the world again and force their fascist and totalitarian dictates on neighboring countries and ending their goal of world dominance. Why can we never learn from history and doom ourselves to repeating the appeasement and mistakes from the past when we pay for the lessons that these conflicts attempt to teach us with the precious blood of thousands of brave American men and women who fight to insure that this country remains free and has the ability to share that freedom with countries who suffer from the oppression of tyranny whether from a brutal dictator or the twisting of a religion by radicals who seek world domination in the name of Allah! Why when we need another Winston Churchill is the world full of Neville Chamberlins who believe appeasement and giving in to the dictates of tyranny are the only solution for peace. It is time to finish the war that was thrust upon us. Those who refuse to accept Iraq as part of that war are part of the problem and not the solution. While Hussein did not participate directly in 9/11 he willingly assisted many who did and regardless of whether you choose to accept the truth or not had the capability to sell, give or supply weaponry to terrorist states or groups to assist in the Jihad that continues today. Is is going to take another 9/11 for this country to wake up and realize that this enemy is not going to go away simply because we negotiate to the dictates of the terror state of Iran or leave the battlefield of Iraq because it is politically correct ? We have a history because of our freedoms of lulling ourselves to sleep thinking that we are not vulnerable to the evil situations that effect the rest of the world. We slept before Pearl Harbor ! We slept before 9/11 and we are being lulled back to sleep by the appeasement crowd who believe that victory is a political catch phrase and not the only reason to participate in any war. Yes there are many situations that force war upon as and this one in no different. But once forced into war there should never be any end to it other than VICTORY! Without complete victory we fight and re-fight the same war over again sometimes with a different enemy but many times with a similar or the same enemy. The enemy we fight today in Iraq, Afghanistan, in our airports, countries that deceive like Iran, and in secluded cells that are waiting to strike sees appeasement as weakness and uses that weakness as a means to attack and instill fear with their terrorist tactics. We have taken the fight to the enemy reducing their capabilities and damaging their abilities. The appeasement that is showing its ugly face now which seeks surrender rather than victory will and is allowing this radical Islamic enemy a chance to regroup, rearm and reaffirm their commitment and support from their army of Jihadists and terror states like Iran and Syria that support them! We have the power and the ability to win and prevent Iranian dominance and protect a free Iraq if we would use our capabilities! Victory is possible and is ours if we would only learn from the past and step forward to achieve the only solution to any war, VICTORY!!!
Ken Taylor




6 Comments:
Because so called "victory" in a civil war means choosing one side or faction over another: in this case that mean's choosing between religious sects. So who's side are you on? The minority Sunni's? Or the majority Shia's?
And let me ask you a relativly simple question: If the greatest military in the history of the world (us) can't quell the sectarian violence, as well as the Bathist insurgents, as well as any terrorists, then how the hell do you expect to train the Iraqi Army to do it?
Heck, we defeated Hitler in less time.
All you points are very valid and it's a tough thing to answer.
We defeated Hitler because we dropped to Atomic bombs on Japan...
THAT'S what ended WWII, noting else, IMHO.
The bomb(s) ended WW2 - the Russian and Allied/American invasion defeated Hitler in his bunker in Berlin. Two fronts, two theaters. We really were the f-ing the greatest back then. Because we were fighting the "good fight." Hitler had armies marching across Europe, and had killed 20 million people before he was done. Compared to that, this Iraq War is dinky. And Bush still can't win it.
Remember, terrorism is nothing new.
Terrorism is not new, but it has changed tacts. Back then, the terror was led by nations, now it's fractionated groups within many countries, no soverign nations involved...it really complicats the equation.
AND, ou militay has been torn apart, to a seriously low level. As in WWII, we had little militay and hardly any Navy and we had to spend 6 trillion 1941 dollars to get headed in the right direction. We can't get the Congress to spend that type of money now...no perceived threat to the homeland on any specific front, as in WWII.
It's a tough one MK, it's a tough one indeed.
Terrorism hasn't changed tactics bacause terrorism, by definition, IS a tactic.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home